Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


First published on April 13, 2007
This version was published on July 1, 2007
Neuro Oncol 2007 9(3):343-353; DOI:10.1215/15228517-2007-007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/3/343    most recent
15228517-2007-007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sampson, j. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pedain, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Duke University Press

Clinical Investigations

Clinical utility of a patient-specific algorithm for simulating intracerebral drug infusions

john H. Sampson, Raghu Raghavan, Martin L. Brady, james M. Provenzale, james E. Herndon, II, David Croteau, Allan H. Friedman, David A. Reardon, R. Edward Coleman, Terence Wong, Darell D. Bigner, Ira Pastan, María Inmaculada Rodríguez-Ponce, Philipp Tanner, Raj Puri and Christoph Pedain

Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery (J.H.S., A.H.F., D.A.R.), Department of Radiology (J.P., R.E.C., T.W.), Department of Pathology (J.H.S., D.D.B.), and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (J.E.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Therataxis, LLC, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA (R.R., M.L.B.); NeoPharm, Inc., Waukegan, IL 60085, USA (D.C.); Laboratory of Molecular Biology, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA (I.P.); BrainLAB, 85622 Feldkirchen, Germany (M.I.R.-P., C.P.); Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Grosshadern, University of Munich, D-81377 Munich, Germany (P.T.); and Division of Cellular and Gene Therapies, CBER, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA (R.P.)

Address correspondence to john H. Sampson, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Box 3050, Duke university Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA (john.sampson{at}duke.edu).

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a novel drug delivery technique that uses positive infusion pressure to deliver therapeutic agents directly into the interstitial spaces of the brain. Despite the promise of CED, clinical trials have demonstrated that target-tissue anatomy and patient-specific physiology play a major role in drug distribution using this technique. In this study, we retrospectively tested the ability of a software algorithm using MR diffusion tensor imaging to predict patient-specific drug distributions by CED. A tumor-targeted cytotoxin, cintredekin besudotox (interleukin 13-PE38QQR), was coinfused with iodine 123-labeled human serum albumin (123I-HSA), in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. The spatial distribution of 123I-HSA was then compared to a drug distribution simulation provided by the software algorithm. The algorithm had a high sensitivity (71.4%) and specificity (100%) for identifying the high proportion (7 of 14) of catheter trajectories that failed to deliver drug into the desired anatomical region (p = 0.021). This usually occurred when catheter trajectories crossed deep sulci, resulting in leak of the infusate into the subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid space. The mean concordance of the volume of distribution at the 50% isodose level between the actual 123I-HSA distribution and simulation was 65.75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.0%-79.5%), and the mean maximal inplane deviation was less than 8.5 mm (95% CI, 4.0-13.0 mm). The use of this simulation algorithm was considered clinically useful in 84.6% of catheters. Routine use of this algorithm, and its further developments, should improve prospective selection of catheter trajectories, and thereby improve the efficacy of drugs delivered by this promising technique.

Key Words: brain neoplasms • computer simulation • convection • drug delivery systems • single-photon emission computed tomography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
Y. Mardor, D. Last, D. Daniels, R. Shneor, S. E. Maier, D. Nass, and Z. Ram
Convection-Enhanced Drug Delivery of Interleukin-4 Pseudomonas Exotoxin (PRX321): Increased Distribution and Magnetic Resonance Monitoring
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2009; 330(2): 520 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Martens, Y. Laabs, H. S. Gunther, D. Kemming, Z. Zhu, L. Witte, C. Hagel, M. Westphal, and K. Lamszus
Inhibition of Glioblastoma Growth in a Highly Invasive Nude Mouse Model Can Be Achieved by Targeting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor but not Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 14(17): 5447 - 5458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro Oncol DukeHome page
J. H. Sampson, G. Akabani, G. E. Archer, M. S. Berger, R. E. Coleman, A. H. Friedman, H. S. Friedman, K. Greer, J. E. Herndon II, S. Kunwar, et al.
Intracerebral infusion of an EGFR-targeted toxin in recurrent malignant brain tumors
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2008; 10(3): 320 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2007 by Society for Neuro-Oncology