Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Advance Publication


First published on September 10, 2008
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2009
Neuro Oncol 2008, DOI:10.1215/15228517-2008-075
This Article
Right arrow Advance Publication Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/1/80    most recent
15228517-2008-075v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vredenburgh, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
© Copyright 2008 by the Society for Neuro-Oncology

Received October 25, 2007
Accepted August 22, 2008

Review

Experience with irinotecan for the treatment of malignant glioma

James J. Vredenburgh 1*, Annick Desjardins 2, David A. Reardon 2, Henry S. Friedman 2

1 The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3624, Trent Drive, 047 Baker House, Durham, NC 27710, USA
2 Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vrede001{at}mc.duke.edu.


   Abstract

Malignant glioma is the most commonly occurring primary malignant brain tumor. It is difficult to treat and usually associated with an inexorable, rapidly fatal clinical course. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical excision are core components in the management of malignant glioma. However, chemotherapy, even with the most active regimens currently available, achieves only modest improvement in overall survival. Novel agents and new approaches to therapy are required to improve clinical outcomes. Irinotecan, a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and an agent with high activity against solid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, is an inhibitor of topoisomerase I, a critical enzyme needed for DNA transcription. Irinotecan crosses the blood-brain barrier and, in preclinical investigations, has demonstrated cytotoxic activity against central nervous system tumor xenografts. Its antitumor activity has also been demonstrated against glioblastoma cells with multidrug resistance. Studies in adult and pediatric patients with recurrent, intractable malignant glioma have evaluated irinotecan as monotherapy and in combination with other agents, including temozolomide, carmustine, thalidomide, and bevacizumab. Studies of irinotecan in combination with other medications, particularly temozolomide and bevacizumab, have yielded promising results. Irinotecan monotherapy has demonstrated efficacy; however, its efficacy appears to be enhanced when it is used in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. When administered concurrently with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, the dosage must be increased to compensate for enhanced cytochrome CY3A4/5 enzyme activity. Toxicities associated with irinotecan have been manageable; the most important dose-limiting toxicities are neutropenia and diarrhea. Irinotecan-based chemotherapy of malignant glioma merits further study.

Key Words: EIAEDs, glioblastoma, irinotecan, malignant glioma, SN-38


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Advance Publication


Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuro-Oncology