Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Advance Publication


First published on August 13, 2008
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2008
Neuro Oncol 2008, DOI:10.1215/15228517-2008-036
This Article
Right arrow Advance Publication Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/5/675    most recent
15228517-2008-036v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ridley, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
© Copyright 2008 by the Society for Neuro-Oncology

Received November 21, 2007
Accepted February 25, 2008

Basic and Translational Investigations

Multifactorial analysis of predictors of outcome in pediatric intracranial ependymoma

Lee Ridley 1, Ruman Rahman 1, Marie-Anne Brundler 2, David Ellison 3, James Lowe 4, Keith Robson 4, Emma Prebble 5, Inga Luckett 3, Richard J. Gilbertson 3, Sheila Parkes 6, Vikki Rand 1, Beth Coyle 1, Richard G. Grundy 1*, on behalf of the Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group Biological Studies Committee

1 Children's Brain Tumor Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
2 Department of Pathology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
3 St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
4 Children's Brain Tumor Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Department of Neuropathology, Nottingham University Hospital, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
5 Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
6 West Midlands Regional Children's Tumor Registry, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: richard.grundy{at}nottingham.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Pediatric ependymomas are enigmatic tumors, and their clinical management remains one of the more difficult in pediatric oncology. The identification of biological correlates of outcome and therapeutic targets remains a significant challenge in this disease. We therefore analyzed a panel of potential biological markers to determine optimal prognostic markers. We constructed a tissue microarray from 97 intracranial tumors from 74 patients (WHO grade II-III) and analyzed the candidate markers nucleolin, telomerase catalytic subunit (hTERT; antibody clone 44F12), survivin, Ki-67, and members of the receptor tyrosine kinase I (RTK-I) family by immunohistochemistry. Telomerase activity was determined using the in vitro-based telomere repeat amplification protocol assay, and telomere length was measured using the telomere restriction fragment assay. Primary tumors with low versus high nucleolin protein expression had a 5-year event-free survival of 74% ± 13% and 31% ± 7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified low nucleolin expression to be independently associated with a more favorable prognosis (hazard ratio = 6.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-24.2; p = 0.008). Ki-67 and survivin correlated with histological grade but not with outcome. Immunohistochemical detection of the RTK-I family did not correlate with grade or outcome. Telomerase activity was evident in 19 of 22 primary tumors, with telo­mere lengthening and/or maintenance occurring in five of seven recurrent cases. Low nucleolin expression was the single most important biological predictor of outcome in pediatric intracranial ependymoma. Furthermore, telo­merase reactivation and maintenance of telomeric repeats appear necessary for childhood ependymoma progression. These findings require corroboration in a clinical trial setting.

Key Words: ependymoma, nucleolin, pediatric, telomerase, telomere


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
J.-P. Kilday, R. Rahman, S. Dyer, L. Ridley, J. Lowe, B. Coyle, and R. Grundy
Pediatric Ependymoma: Biological Perspectives
Mol. Cancer Res., June 1, 2009; 7(6): 765 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Advance Publication


Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuro-Oncology