Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Advance Publication


First published on March 2, 2006
A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2006
Neuro Oncol 2006, DOI:10.1215/15228517-2005-008
This Article
Right arrow Advance Publication Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
8/2/175    most recent
15228517-2005-008v2
15228517-2005-008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hargrave, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bouffet, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
© Copyright 2006 by the Society for Neuro-Oncology

Received July 11, 2005
Accepted November 21, 2005

Clinical Investigations

Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology

Darren R. Hargrave 1*, Ursula A. Hargrave 1, Eric Bouffet 2

1 Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton
2 Paediatric Brain Tumour Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: darren.hargrave{at}rmh.nhs.uk.


   Abstract

The Internet is now the single largest source of health information and is used by many patients and their families who are affected by childhood brain tumors. To assess the quality of pediatric neuro-oncology information on the Internet, we used search engines to look for information on five common tumor types (brain stem glioma, craniopharyngioma, ependymoma, low-grade glioma, and medulloblastoma). The Web sites were evaluated for content quality by using the validated DISCERN rating instrument. Breadth of content and its accuracy were also scored by a checklist tool. Readability statistics were computed on the highest-rated sites. Of 114 evaluated Web sites, the sources were as follows: institutional, 46%; commercial, 35%; charitable, 15%; support group, 2%; and alternative medicine, 2%. Good interobserver correlation was found for both ratings instruments. The DISCERN tool rated Web sites as excellent (4%), good (7%), fair (29%), poor (39%), or very poor (21%). Only 5% of the Web sites provided one or more inaccurate pieces of information. Web sites were found deficient in topics covering etiology, late effects, prognosis, and treatment choices. Few sites offered information in languages other than English, and readability statistics showed an average required reading level of U.S. grade 12+ (the suggested level being grades 6-8 for an adult audience). The Internet is increasingly being used as a source of oncology information for patients and their families. Health care professionals should be actively involved in developing high-quality information for use in the next generation of Web sites.

Key Words: health information, Internet, neuro-oncology, pediatrics, readability


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Advance Publication


Copyright 2006 by Society for Neuro-Oncology