Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


First published on April 22, 2008
This version was published on January 1, 2008
Neuro Oncol 2008 10(3):292-299; DOI:10.1215/15228517-2008-014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/3/292    most recent
15228517-2008-014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assadian, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bedell, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Duke University Press

Basic and Translational Investigations

FDG-PET imaging for the evaluation of antiglioma agents in a rat model

Sarah Assadian, Antonio Aliaga, Rolando F. Del Maestro, Alan C. Evans and Barry J. Bedell

McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (S.A., A.A., A.C.E., B.J.B.) and Brain Tumor Research Centre (S.A., R.F.D.M.), Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Address all correspondence to Barry J. Bedell, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, 3801 University St., Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 2B4 (bbedell{at}bic.mni.mcgill.ca).

The increasing development of novel anticancer agents demands parallel advances in the methods used to rapidly assess their therapeutic efficacy (TE) in the preclinical phase. We evaluated the ability of small-animal PET, using the 18F-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) radiotracer, to predict the TE of a number of anticancer agents in the rat C6 glioma model following 3 days of treatment. Semi-quantitative measurements of changes in FDG uptake during the course of treatment (standardized uptake value response [SUVr]) were found to be significantly lower in tumors treated with the hypoxia-inducible factor-1{alpha} inhibitor YC-1 (15 mg/kg) than in tumors in the control group. No significant SUVr change was observed following a similar 3-day regimen with the proapoptotic agent NS1619 (20 µg/kg), the combination of YC-1 and NS1619, or the alkylating agent temozolomide (7.5 mg/kg). Quantitative immunohistochemical studies demonstrated significantly lower levels of glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1) expression in the YC-1–treated tumors, thereby correlating with the low SUVr observed in this group. The ability of SUVr to predict gold-standard outcomes of TE was further validated as YC-1–treated tumors had decreased volumes compared to control tumors. As such, we successfully demonstrated the ability of FDG-PET to rapidly determine the TE of novel agents for the treatment of glioma in the preclinical phase of evaluation.

Key Words: anticancer agents • C6 glioma • 18F-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose • positron emission tomography • therapeutic efficacy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
K. B. Contractor and E. O. Aboagye
Monitoring Predominantly Cytostatic Treatment Response with 18F-FDG PET
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 97S - 105S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuro-Oncology