Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


First published on November 15, 2006
This version was published on January 1, 2007
Neuro Oncol 2007 9(1):29-38; DOI:10.1215/15228517-2006-025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/1/29    most recent
15228517-2006-025v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ballman, K. V.
Right arrow Articles by Jaeckle, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Clinical Investigations

The relationship between six-month progression-free survival and 12-month overall survival end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme

Karla V. Ballman1, Jan C. Buckner, Paul D. Brown, Caterina Giannini, Patrick J. Flynn, Betsy R. LaPlant and Kurt A. Jaeckle

Division of Biostatistics (K.V.B., B.R.L.), Division of Medical Oncology (J.C.B.), Department of Radiation Oncology (P.D.B.), and Department of Pathology (C.G.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Metro-Minnesota Community Clinical Oncology Program (P.J.F.), St. Louis Park, MN; and Department of Neurology (K.A.J.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; USA

1 Address correspondence to Karla Ballman, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic, Division of Biostatistics, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA (ballman{at}mayo.edu).

Common end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are six-month progression-free survival (PFS6) and 12-month overall survival (OS12). OS12 can be accurately measured but may be confounded with subsequent therapies upon progression, whereas the converse is true for PFS6. Our goal was to assess the relationship between these end points separately for phase II trials in patients with newly diagnosed GBM and patients with recurrent GBM. Data were pooled from 11 North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials for patients with newly diagnosed GBM (n = 1348). All patients received radiotherapy and pharmaceutical therapy (before, during, or after radiotherapy). Data were pooled from 16 trials that used various pharmaceuticals in treating patients for recurrent GBM (n = 345). All trial regimens were declared nonefficacious by predefined criteria. Overall per-patient concordance was estimated with a kappa statistic. The relationship between OS12 and PFS6 across study arms was assessed by weighted linear regression and Pearson's correlation. Simulation was used to determine the agreement of study outcomes when using PFS6 versus OS12 end points. Cox models with progression status as a time-dependent variable and Kaplan-Meier estimators were used to ascertain the association between progression-free survival status and overall survival. At present, 97% of the patients with newly diagnosed GBM and 95% of those with recurrent GBM have died. The PFS6 and OS12 were 43% and 41%, respectively, for patients with newly diagnosed disease and 9% and 14% for patients with recurrent disease. There was only moderate concordance between the end points on both the patient level and the study level. For the simulation studies, we established phase II efficacy criteria for each end point by using the pooled estimates of OS12 (PFS6) as historical controls. The study decisions made using PFS6 and OS12 were in agreement 88% and 90% of the time for the trials of newly diagnosed and recurrent disease, respectively. Finally, there was a strong association between progression-free survival status and overall survival. PFS6 seems to be a reasonable end point for phase II trials in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Key Words: end points • glioblastoma multiforme • phase II clinical trials




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
R. I. Jakacki, A. Yates, S. M. Blaney, T. Zhou, R. Timmerman, A. M. Ingle, L. Flom, M. D. Prados, P. C. Adamson, and I. F. Pollack
A phase I trial of temozolomide and lomustine in newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas of childhood
Neuro-oncol, August 1, 2008; 10(4): 569 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
K. R. Lamborn, W. K. A. Yung, S. M. Chang, P. Y. Wen, T. F. Cloughesy, L. M. DeAngelis, H. I. Robins, F. S. Lieberman, H. A. Fine, K. L. Fink, et al.
Progression-free survival: An important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas
Neuro-oncol, April 1, 2008; 10(2): 162 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J.W. Henson, S. Ulmer, and G.J. Harris
Brain Tumor Imaging in Clinical Trials
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2008; 29(3): 419 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. A. Gimotty, D. Guerry, and K. Flaherty
Using Benchmarks Based on Historical Survival Rates for Screening New Therapies for Stage IV Melanoma Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 26(4): 517 - 518.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Hutterer, P. Knyazev, A. Abate, M. Reschke, H. Maier, N. Stefanova, T. Knyazeva, V. Barbieri, M. Reindl, A. Muigg, et al.
Axl and Growth Arrest Specific Gene 6 Are Frequently Overexpressed in Human Gliomas and Predict Poor Prognosis in Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 130 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. A. Fine, L. Kim, P. S. Albert, J. P. Duic, H. Ma, W. Zhang, T. Tohnya, W. D. Figg, and C. Royce
A Phase I Trial of Lenalidomide in Patients with Recurrent Primary Central Nervous System Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 13(23): 7101 - 7106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
F. B. Furnari, T. Fenton, R. M. Bachoo, A. Mukasa, J. M. Stommel, A. Stegh, W. C. Hahn, K. L. Ligon, D. N. Louis, C. Brennan, et al.
Malignant astrocytic glioma: genetics, biology, and paths to treatment
Genes & Dev., November 1, 2007; 21(21): 2683 - 2710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. J. Vredenburgh, A. Desjardins, J. E. Herndon II, J. Marcello, D. A. Reardon, J. A. Quinn, J. N. Rich, S. Sathornsumetee, S. Gururangan, J. Sampson, et al.
Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme
J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2007; 25(30): 4722 - 4729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2007 by Society for Neuro-Oncology