Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Neuro Oncol 2005 7(1):1-11; DOI:10.1215/S1152851704000420
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heimberger, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Preclinical Experimental Therapeutics

Mechanisms of action of rapamycin in gliomas

Amy B. Heimberger2, Enze Wang, Eric C. McGary, Kenneth R. Hess, Verlene K. Henry, Tadahisa Shono, Zvi Cohen, Joy Gumin, Raymond Sawaya, Charles A. Conrad and Frederick F. Lang

Brain Tumor Center and Departments of Neurosurgery (A.B.H., E.W., V.K.H., T.S., Z.C., J.G., R.S., F.F.L.), Biostatistics (K.R.H.), and Neuro-Oncology (C.A.C.), The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030; Hilton Head Regional Medical Center, Hilton Head, SC 29926 (E.C.M.); USA

2 Address correspondence to Amy B. Heimberger, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 442, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA (aheimber{at}mdanderson.org).

Abstract

Rapamycin has previously been shown to be efficacious against intracerebral glioma xenografts and to act in a cytostatic manner against gliomas. However, very little is known about the mechanism of action of rapamycin. The purpose of our study was to further investigate the in vitro and in vivo mechanisms of action of rapamycin, to elucidate molecular end points that may be applicable for investigation in a clinical trial, and to examine potential mechanisms of treatment failure. In the phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted from chromosome 10 (PTEN)-null glioma cell lines U-87 and D-54, but not the oligodendroglioma cell line HOG (PTEN null), doses of rapamycin at the IC50 resulted in accumulation of cells in G1, with a corresponding decrease in the fraction of cells traversing the S phase as early as 24 h after dosing. All glioma cell lines tested had markedly diminished production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) when cultured with rapamycin, even at doses below the IC50. After 48 h of exposure to rapamycin, the glioma cell lines (but not HOG cells) showed downregulation of the membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) invasion molecule. In U-87 cells, MMP-2 was downregulated, and in D-54 cells, both MMP-2 and MMP-9 were downregulated after treatment with rapamycin. Treatment of established subcutaneous U-87 xenografts in vivo resulted in marked tumor regression (P < 0.05). Immunohistochemical studies of subcutaneous U-87 tumors demonstrated diminished production of VEGF in mice treated with rapamycin. Gelatin zymography showed marked reduction of MMP-2 in the mice with subcutaneous U-87 xenografts that were treated with rapamycin as compared with controls treated with phosphatebuffered saline. In contrast, treatment of established intracerebral U-87 xenografts did not result in increased median survival despite inhibition of the Akt pathway within the tumors. Also, in contrast with our findings for subcutaneous tumors, immunohistochemistry and quantitative Western blot analysis results for intracerebral U-87 xenografts indicated that there is not significant VEGF production, which suggests possible deferential regulation of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1{alpha} in the intracerebral compartment. These findings demonstrate that the complex operational mechanisms of rapamy-cin against gliomas include cytostasis, anti-VEGF, and anti-invasion activity, but these are dependent on the in vivo location of the tumor and have implications for the design of a clinical trial.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. Song, Y. Li, J. Lee, A. L. Schwartz, and G. Bu
Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 1 Promotes Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion by Inducing the Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases 2 and 9
Cancer Res., February 1, 2009; 69(3): 879 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Yang, M. J. Clarke, B. L. Carlson, A. C. Mladek, M. A. Schroeder, P. Decker, W. Wu, G. J. Kitange, P. T. Grogan, J. M. Goble, et al.
PTEN Loss Does Not Predict for Response to RAD001 (Everolimus) in a Glioblastoma Orthotopic Xenograft Test Panel
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3993 - 4001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Sliwa, D. Markovic, K. Gabrusiewicz, M. Synowitz, R. Glass, M. Zawadzka, A. Wesolowska, H. Kettenmann, and B. Kaminska
The invasion promoting effect of microglia on glioblastoma cells is inhibited by cyclosporin A
Brain, February 1, 2007; 130(2): 476 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2005 by Society for Neuro-Oncology