Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Neuro Oncol 2004 6(1):38-43; DOI:10.1215/S1152851703000188
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chua, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cher, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Clinical Investigations

Phase 2 study of temozolomide and Caelyx in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

Susan L. Chua, Mark A. Rosenthal1, Shirley S. Wong, David M. Ashley, Anne-marie Woods, Anthony Dowling and Lawrence M. Cher

Centre for Developmental Cancer Therapeutics, Parkville, Victoria, affiliates: Department of Clinical Haematology and Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3050 (S.L.C., M.A.R., S.S.W., A.W.); Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3050 (D.M.A.); Department of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065 (A.D.); and Department of Medical Oncology, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, Heidelberg, Victoria 3184 (L.M.C.); Australia

1 Address correspondence to Mark Rosenthal, Department of Clinical Haematology and Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia (mark.rosenthal{at}mh.org.au).

Abstract

Temozolomide has established activity in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Caelyx (liposomal doxorubicin) has established activity in a broad range of tumors but has not been extensively evaluated in the treatment of GBM. Phase 1 data suggest that temozolomide and Caelyx can be combined safely at full dose. In this phase 2 study, combination temozolomide (200 mg/m2 orally, days 1-5) and Caelyx (40 mg/m2 i.v., day 1) was given every 4 weeks to a cohort of 22 patients with recurrent GBM, who received a total of 109 cycles (median 3.5 cycles). The median age of the patients was 55 years (range, 31-80 years), and 17 were male. All patients had received radiotherapy, but only 2 had received prior chemotherapy. One patient (5%) had a complete response, 3 patients (14%) had a partial response, and 11 patients (50%) had stable disease. The median time to progression for the cohort was 3.2 months (range, 1-13 months). Median overall survival was 8.2 months (range, 1-16+ months). Seven patients (32%) were progression free at 6 months. Hematological toxicity included grade 3/4 neutropenia in 4 patients (18%) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 4 patients (18%). Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity included rash in 3 patients (14%), nausea and vomiting in 1 patient (4%), hypersensitivity reaction to Caelyx in 3 patients (14%), and palmar-plantar toxicity in 1 patient (4%). We conclude that the combination of temozolomide and Caelyx is well tolerated, results in a modest objective response rate, but has encouraging disease stabilization in the treatment of recurrent GBM.







  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2004 by Society for Neuro-Oncology