Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Neuro Oncol 2003 5(2):89-95; DOI:10.1215/15228517-5-2-89
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Clinical Neuro-Oncology

Multifaceted end points in brain tumor clinical trials: Cognitive deterioration precedes MRI progression

Christina A. Meyers1 and Kenneth R. Hess

Departments of Neuro-Oncology (C.A.M.) and Biostatistics (K.R.H.), The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA

1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Christina A. Meyers, Department of Neuro-Oncology, Box 431, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030 (cameyers{at}mdanderson.org).

Abstract

Current treatments for brain cancer have, for the most part, equivocal survival benefit. However, clinical trials of new anticancer agents do not adequately assess potential clinical benefits for patient function other than survival and time to tumor progression.We evaluated 56 patients with recurrent brain tumors who were recruited on phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials and given assessments of cognitive function, quality of life (QOL), and ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) prior to receiving treatment and at intervals coinciding with MRI scans, generally monthly. Meaningful change on the cognitive and functional assessments was determined by the reliable change index. Cognitive or functional deterioration was then used as a time-dependent covariate in a Cox proportional hazards regression model with tumor progression, as defined by standard criteria, as the end point. Cognitive deterioration occurred 6 weeks prior to radiographic failure (median 7.4 weeks vs. 13.4 weeks). In contrast, median time for QOL to deteriorate was not achieved. Median time for instrumental ADL to decline was 43 weeks, long after tumor progression. For patients with brain cancer, brain function began to worsen before MRI evidence of tumor progression. QOL and ADL function were not strongly tied to cognitive decline or to time to tumor progression, suggesting that these measures may not be sufficiently sensitive to change in clinical trials of new anticancer agents, although they are important measures in terms of patient care. This study also demonstrates the feasibility of performing neurocognitive testing in this patient population. New drugs that slow the cognitive decline of brain tumor patients may be of clinical benefit regardless of the impact on overall survival.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
I. Bosma, M. J. Vos, J. J. Heimans, M. J.B. Taphoorn, N. K. Aaronson, T. J. Postma, H. M. van der Ploeg, M. Muller, W. P. Vandertop, Ben. J. Slotman, et al.
The course of neurocognitive functioning in high-grade glioma patients
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 53 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. D. Brown, A. W. Jensen, S. J. Felten, K. V. Ballman, P. L. Schaefer, K. A. Jaeckle, J. H. Cerhan, and J. C. Buckner
Detrimental Effects of Tumor Progression on Cognitive Function of Patients With High-Grade Glioma
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 24(34): 5427 - 5433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. R. Gilbert and F. F. Lang
Anaplastic Oligodendroglial Tumors: A Tale of Two Trials
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2689 - 2690.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. G. Shaw, R. Rosdhal, R. B. D'Agostino Jr, J. Lovato, M. J. Naughton, M. E. Robbins, and S. R. Rapp
Phase II Study of Donepezil in Irradiated Brain Tumor Patients: Effect on Cognitive Function, Mood, and Quality of Life
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2006; 24(9): 1415 - 1420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Khuntia, P. Brown, J. Li, and M. P. Mehta
Whole-Brain Radiotherapy in the Management of Brain Metastasis
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2006; 24(8): 1295 - 1304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. A. Meyers and P. D. Brown
Role and Relevance of Neurocognitive Assessment in Clinical Trials of Patients With CNS Tumors
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2006; 24(8): 1305 - 1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Klein, T.J. Postma, M.J.B. Taphoorn, N.K. Aaronson, W.P. Vandertop, M. Muller, H.M. van der Ploeg, and J.J. Heimans
The prognostic value of cognitive functioning in the survival of patients with high-grade glioma
Neurology, December 23, 2003; 61(12): 1796 - 1798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. A. Meyers and J. S. Wefel
The Use of the Mini-Mental State Examination to Assess Cognitive Functioning in Cancer Trials: No Ifs, Ands, Buts, or Sensitivity
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 21(19): 3557 - 3558.
[Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2003 by Society for Neuro-Oncology