Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Neuro Oncol 2002 4(2):109-114; DOI:10.1215/15228517-4-2-109
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robins, H. I.
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Clinical Therapy Trails-Drug

A phase II trial of thymidine and carboplatin for recurrent malignant glioma: A North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study

H. Ian Robins2, Susan M. Chang, Michael D. Prados, W.K. Alfred Yung, Kenneth Hess, David Schiff, Harry Greenberg, Karen Fink, Kelly Nicolas, John G. Kuhn, Timothy Cloughesy, Larry Junck and Minesh Mehta

Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53792 (H.I.R., M.M.); University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 (S.M.C., M.D.P., K.N.); University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030 (W.K.A.Y., K.H.); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (D.S.); Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, MI 48109 (L.J., H.G.); University of Texas Southwestern at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 (K.F.); University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78284 (J.G.K.); University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (T.C.)

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to H. Ian Robins, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center K4/666, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792.

Abstract

This phase II study in recurrent high-grade glioma evaluated the response rate, toxicities, and time to treatment failure of high-dose carboplatin modulated by a 24-h infusion of thymidine (75 g/m2). The trial was based on preclinical data and a prior phase I study (J. Clin. Oncol. 17, 2922-2931, 1999); a phase II recurrent high-grade glioma study was initiated in July of 1998. Thymidine was given over 24 h; carboplatin was given over 20 min at hour 20 of the thymidine infusion. The starting dose of carboplatin had a value of 7 for the area under the curve (AUC), with allowance for dose escalation of 1 AUC unit per cycle if grade 2 toxicity was observed. Treatment cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. Accrual as of September 1999 was 45 patients [4 were unevaluable]: 76% with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), 20% with anaplastic oligodendroglioma, 2% with mixed type, and 2% with anaplastic astrocytoma. Most patients had prior chemotherapy (78%). As observed in the earlier phase I study (in which carboplatin pharmacokinetics were unaltered by thymidine or antiseizure medications), thymidine was myeloprotective, resulting in a minimal need for dose reduction for patients having a >2 grade toxicity (in only 4% of the courses of treatment). Of 101 total courses, the number of courses (at the AUCs) was 3 (5), 4 (6), 58 (7), 20 (8), 11 (9), and 5 (10). Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included headache (4%), altered consciousness (3%), fatigue (1%), and nausea (3%). Responses included 2 partial (1 oligodendroglioma, 1 GBM; 5%); 3 minor (1 anaplastic astrocytoma, 2 GBM; 7.3%); 6 stable disease (14.6%); and 30 progressive disease (73.2%). For GBM patients, median survival was 23 weeks (with a 95% confidence interval of 20 to 50 weeks), and progression-free survival was 8 weeks (with a 95% confidence interval of 7-16 weeks). These results in GBM were comparable to other phase II GBM trials and thus do not represent a therapeutic advance in the treatment of GBM. Taken collectively, however, results are consistent with continued investigation of thymidine in combination with chemotherapeutic agents for high-grade glioma and other malignant diseases. The significant myeloprotection afforded by thymidine may have particular relevance to polychemotherapeutic regimens.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
S. M. Chang, K. R. Lamborn, J. G. Kuhn, W.K. A. Yung, M. R. Gilbert, P. Y. Wen, H. A. Fine, M. P. Mehta, L. M. DeAngelis, F. S. Lieberman, et al.
Neurooncology clinical trial design for targeted therapies: Lessons learned from the North American Brain Tumor Consortium
Neuro-oncol, August 1, 2008; 10(4): 631 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. A. Grossman, A. O'Neill, M. Grunnet, M. Mehta, J. L. Pearlman, H. Wagner, M. Gilbert, H. B. Newton, and R. Hellman
Phase III Study Comparing Three Cycles of Infusional Carmustine and Cisplatin Followed by Radiation Therapy With Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Carmustine in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Supratentorial Glioblastoma Multiforme: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 2394
J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2003; 21(8): 1485 - 1491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2002 by Society for Neuro-Oncology