Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Neuro Oncol 2001 3(1):46-54; DOI:10.1215/15228517-3-1-46
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doolittle, N. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Clinical Therapy Trials - Outcome

Importance of dose intensity in neurooncology clinical trials: Summary Report of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Consortium

Nancy D. Doolittle, Clarke P. Anderson, W. Archie Bleyer, J. Gregory Cairncross, Timothy Cloughesy, Stephen L. Eck, Paul Guastadisegni, Walter A. Hall, Leslie L. Muldoon, Sunil J. Patel, David Peereboom, Tali Siegal, Edward A. Neuwelt2 for the Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Consortium

Department of Neurology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR 97201-3098 (N.D.D., P.G., L.L.M., E.A.N.); Childrens Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027 (C.P.A.); Department of Pediatrics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 99030 (W.A.B.); London Regional Cancer Center, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4L6 (J.G.C.); Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Reed Neurological Research Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1769 (T.C.); University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6160 (S.L.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (W.A.H.); Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425-2272 (S.J.P.); Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195 (D.P.); Neuro-Oncology Center, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel 91120 (T.S.)

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Edward A. Neuwelt, Oregon Health Sciences University, Department of Neurology, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd.-L603, Portland, OR 97201-3098.

Abstract

Therapeutic options for the treatment of malignant brain tumors have been limited, in part, because of the presence of the blood-brain barrier. For this reason, the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Consortium, the focus of which was the "Importance of Dose Intensity in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials," was convened in April 2000, at Government Camp, Mount Hood, Oregon. This meeting, which was supported by the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, brought together clinicians and basic scientists from across the U.S. to discuss the role of dose intensity and enhanced chemotherapy delivery in the treatment of malignant brain tumors and to design multicenter clinical trials. Optimizing chemotherapy delivery to the CNS is crucial, particularly in view of recent progress identifying certain brain tumors as chemosensitive. The discovery that specific constellations of genetic alterations can predict which tumors are chemoresponsive, and can therefore more accurately predict prognosis, has important implications for delivery of intensive, effective chemotherapy regimens with acceptable toxicities. This report summarizes the discussions, future directions, and key questions regarding dose-intensive treatment of primary CNS lymphoma, CNS relapse of systemic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma, high-grade glioma, and metastatic cancer of the brain. The promising role of cytoenhancers and chemo-protectants as part of dose-intensive regimens for chemosensitive brain tumors and development of improved gene therapies for malignant gliomas are discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
M. A. Askins and B. D. Moore III
Preventing Neurocognitive Late Effects in Childhood Cancer Survivors
J Child Neurol, October 1, 2008; 23(10): 1160 - 1171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
B. D. Moore III
Neurocognitive Outcomes in Survivors of Childhood Cancer
J. Pediatr. Psychol., January 1, 2005; 30(1): 51 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. D. Doolittle, L. E. Abrey, N. Ferrari, W. A. Hall, E. R. Laws, R. E. McLendon, L. L. Muldoon, D. Peereboom, D. R. Peterson, C. P. Reynolds, et al.
Targeted Delivery in Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors: Summary Report of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Consortium
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2002; 8(6): 1702 - 1709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. A. Neuwelt, M. A. Pagel, B. P. Hasler, T. G. Deloughery, and L. L. Muldoon
Therapeutic Efficacy of Aortic Administration of N-Acetylcysteine as a Chemoprotectant against Bone Marrow Toxicity after Intracarotid Administration of Alkylators, with or without Glutathione Depletion in a Rat Model
Cancer Res., November 1, 2001; 61(21): 7868 - 7874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. L. Muldoon, S. L. Walker-Rosenfeld, C. Hale, S. E. Purcell, L. C. Bennett, and E. A. Neuwelt
Rescue from Enhanced Alkylator-Induced Cell Death with Low Molecular Weight Sulfur-Containing Chemoprotectants
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2001; 296(3): 797 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2001 by Society for Neuro-Oncology