QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (26) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wiltshire, R. N. Articles by Bigner, S. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Comparative genetic patterns of glioblastoma multiforme: Potential diagnostic tool for tumor classification

Departments of Pathology (R.N.W., B.K.A.R., H.S.F., S.H.B.), Surgery (H.S.F., A.H.F.), and Pediatrics (H.S.F.), Duke University, Durham, NC 27710

¹ Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sandra H. Bigner, Duke University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, PO Box 3712, Durham, NC 27710.

Abstract

Cytogenetic and molecular genetic studies of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) have shown that the most frequent alterations are gains of chromosome 7, losses of 9p loci and chromosome 10, and gene amplification, primarily of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. Although this profile is potentially useful in distinguishing GBM from other tumor types, the techniques used tend to be labor intensive, and some can detect only gains or losses of genetic loci. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a powerful technique capable of identifying both gains and losses of DNA sequences. The present study compares the CGH evaluation of 22 GBM with classic cytogenetics, loss of heterozygosity by allelotyping, and gene amplification by Southern blot analysis to determine the reliability of CGH in the genetic characterization of GBM. The CGH and karyotypic data were consistent in showing gain of chromosome 7 accompanied by a loss of chromosome 10 as the most frequent abnormality, followed by a loss of 9p in 17 of 22 GBM cases. Loss of heterozygosity of chromosomes 10 (19/22) and 9p (9/22) loci confirmed the underrepresentation by CGH. Genomic amplifications were observed by CGH in 5 of the 10 cases where gene amplification was detected by Southern blot analysis. The data show that CGH is equally reliable, compared with the more established genetic methods, for recognizing the prominent genetic alterations associated with GBM and support its use as a plausible adjunct to glioma classification.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V Martin, L Mazzucchelli, and M Frattini An overview of the epidermal growth factor receptor fluorescence in situ hybridisation challenge in tumour pathology J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2009; 62(4): 314 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Kuga, M. Mizoguchi, Y. Guan, N. Hata, K. Yoshimoto, T. Shono, S. O. Suzuki, Y. Kukita, T. Tahira, S. Nagata, et al. Prevalence of copy-number neutral LOH in glioblastomas revealed by genomewide analysis of laser-microdissected tissues Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2008; 10(6): 995 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-H. Zhou, K. R. Hess, L. Liu, Mark. E. Linskey, and W.K. A. Yung Modeling prognosis for patients with malignant astrocytic gliomas: Quantifying the expression of multiple genetic markers and clinical variables Neuro-oncol, October 1, 2005; 7(4): 485 - 494. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Nigro, A. Misra, L. Zhang, I. Smirnov, H. Colman, C. Griffin, N. Ozburn, M. Chen, E. Pan, D. Koul, et al. Integrated Array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization and Expression Array Profiles Identify Clinically Relevant Molecular Subtypes of Glioblastoma Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 65(5): 1678 - 1686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. N. Wiltshire, J. E. Herndon II, A. Lloyd, H. S. Friedman, D. D. Bigner, S. H. Bigner, and R. E. McLendon Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Astrocytomas: Prognostic and Diagnostic Implications J. Mol. Diagn., August 1, 2004; 6(3): 166 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. C. Burton, K. R. Lamborn, B. G. Feuerstein, M. Prados, J. Scott, P. Forsyth, S. Passe, R. B. Jenkins, and K. D. Aldape Genetic Aberrations Defined by Comparative Genomic Hybridization Distinguish Long-Term from Typical Survivors of Glioblastoma Cancer Res., November 1, 2002; 62(21): 6205 - 6210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Bernard and C. T. Wittwer Real-Time PCR Technology for Cancer Diagnostics Clin. Chem., August 1, 2002; 48(8): 1178 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Aldosari, R. N. Wiltshire, A. Dutra, E. Schrock, R. E. McLendon, H. S. Friedman, D. D. Bigner, and S. H. Bigner Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic investigation of chromosomal abnormalities in human medulloblastoma cell lines and xenograft Neuro-oncol, April 1, 2002; 4(2): 75 - 85. [Abstract] [PDF]