QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (54) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Groothuis, D. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation

The blood-brain and blood-tumor barriers: A review of strategies for increasing drug delivery

Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Department of Neurology; Northwestern University Medical School, Department of Neurobiology and Physiology; and the Institute for Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60201

² Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dennis R. Groothuis, M.D., Evanston Hospital, 2650 Ridge Ave., Evanston, IL 60201.

Abstract

Drug delivery to brain tumors has been a controversial subject. Some believe the blood-brain barrier is not important, while others believe it is the major obstacle in treatment and have devised innovative approaches to circumvent it. These approaches can be divided into two categories: those that attempt to increase drug delivery of intravascularly administered drugs by manipulating either the drugs or capillary permeability, and those that attempt to increase drug delivery by local administration. Several strategies have been developed to increase the fraction of intravascular drug reaching the tumor, including intra-arterial administration, barrier disruption, new ways of packaging drugs, and, most recently, inhibiting drug efflux from tumor. When given intravascularly, all drugs have a common drawback: the body acts as a sink, and, even in the best situations, only a small fraction of administered drug actually reaches the tumor. A consequence is that systemic toxicity is usually the dose-limiting factor. When given locally, such as into the cerebrospinal fluid or directly into the tumor, 100% of an administered dose is delivered to the target site. However, local delivery is associated with variable and unpredictable spatial distribution and variation in drug concentration. The major dose-limiting factor of most local delivery methods will be neurotoxicity. The relative advantages and disadvantages of the different methods of circumventing the blood-brain barrier are presented in this review, and special attention is given to convection-enhanced delivery, which has particular promise for the local delivery of large therapeutic agents such as monoclonal antibodies, antisense oligonucleotides, or viral vectors.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Hashizume, T. Ozawa, S. M. Gryaznov, A. W. Bollen, K. R. Lamborn, W. H. Frey II, and D. F. Deen New therapeutic approach for brain tumors: Intranasal delivery of telomerase inhibitor GRN163 Neuro-oncol, April 1, 2008; 10(2): 112 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Sampson, G. Akabani, G. E. Archer, M. S. Berger, R. E. Coleman, A. H. Friedman, H. S. Friedman, K. Greer, J. E. Herndon II, S. Kunwar, et al. Intracerebral infusion of an EGFR-targeted toxin in recurrent malignant brain tumors Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2008; 10(3): 320 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Krauze, C. O. Noble, T. Kawaguchi, D. Drummond, D. B. Kirpotin, Y. Yamashita, E. Kullberg, J. Forsayeth, J. W. Park, and K. S. Bankiewicz Convection-enhanced delivery of nanoliposomal CPT-11 (irinotecan) and PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in rodent intracranial brain tumor xenografts Neuro-oncol, October 1, 2007; 9(4): 393 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				j. H. Sampson, R. Raghavan, M. L. Brady, j. M. Provenzale, j. E. Herndon II, D. Croteau, A. H. Friedman, D. A. Reardon, R. E. Coleman, T. Wong, et al. Clinical utility of a patient-specific algorithm for simulating intracerebral drug infusions Neuro-oncol, July 1, 2007; 9(3): 343 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Sampson, R. Raghavan, J. M. Provenzale, D. Croteau, D. A. Reardon, R. E. Coleman, I. R. Ponce, I. Pastan, R. K. Puri, and C. Pedain Induction of Hyperintense Signal on T2-Weighted MR Images Correlates with Infusion Distribution from Intracerebral Convection-Enhanced Delivery of a Tumor-Targeted Cytotoxin Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 703 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Yamashita, M. T. Krauze, T. Kawaguchi, C. O. noble, D. C. Drummond, J. W. Park, and K. S. Bankiewicz Convection-enhanced delivery of a topoisomerase I inhibitor (nanoliposomal topotecan) and a topoisomerase II inhibitor (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) in intracranial brain tumor xenografts Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 20 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Saito, M. T. Krauze, C. O. Noble, D. C. Drummond, D. B. Kirpotin, M. S. Berger, J. W. Park, and K. S. Bankiewicz Convection-enhanced delivery of Ls-TPT enables an effective, continuous, low-dose chemotherapy against malignant glioma xenograft model Neuro-oncol, July 1, 2006; 8(3): 205 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Reardon, J. N. Rich, H. S. Friedman, and D. D. Bigner Recent Advances in the Treatment of Malignant Astrocytoma J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2006; 24(8): 1253 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Cha, T. Tihan, F. Crawford, N. J. Fischbein, S. Chang, A. Bollen, S. J. Nelson, M. Prados, M. S. Berger, and W. P. Dillon Differentiation of Low-Grade Oligodendrogliomas from Low-Grade Astrocytomas by Using Quantitative Blood-Volume Measurements Derived from Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2005; 26(2): 266 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ostermann, C. Csajka, T. Buclin, S. Leyvraz, F. Lejeune, L. A. Decosterd, and R. Stupp Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Population Pharmacokinetics of Temozolomide in Malignant Glioma Patients Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2004; 10(11): 3728 - 3736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Dai, P. Marbach, M. Lemaire, M. Hayes, and W. F. Elmquist Distribution of STI-571 to the Brain Is Limited by P-Glycoprotein-Mediated Efflux J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2003; 304(3): 1085 - 1092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Brigger, J. Morizet, G. Aubert, H. Chacun, M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe, P. Couvreur, and G. Vassal Poly(ethylene glycol)-Coated Hexadecylcyanoacrylate Nanospheres Display a Combined Effect for Brain Tumor Targeting J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2002; 303(3): 928 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Yang, R. F. Barth, D. M. Adams, M. J. Ciesielski, R. A. Fenstermaker, S. Shukla, W. Tjarks, and M. A. Caligiuri Convection-enhanced Delivery of Boronated Epidermal Growth Factor for Molecular Targeting of EGF Receptor-positive Gliomas Cancer Res., November 15, 2002; 62(22): 6552 - 6558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. S. Ningaraj, M. Rao, K. Hashizume, K. Asotra, and K. L. Black Regulation of Blood-Brain Tumor Barrier Permeability by Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2002; 301(3): 838 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Ma, S. Pulfer, S. Li, J. Chu, K. Reed, and J. M. Gallo Pharmacodynamic-mediated Reduction of Temozolomide Tumor Concentrations by the Angiogenesis Inhibitor TNP-470 Cancer Res., July 1, 2001; 61(14): 5491 - 5498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]