|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic and Translational Investigations |
1 Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurooncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
2 Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
3 Department of Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
4 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
5 Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: michael.weller{at}usz.ch.
| Abstract |
|---|
Cilengitide is a cyclic peptide antagonist of integrins
v
3 and
v
5 which is currently
evaluated as a novel therapeutic agent for recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Its
mode of action is thought to be mainly antiangiogenic, but may include direct effects on
tumor cells, notably on attachment, migration, invasion and viability. Here we show that, at
clinically relevant concentrations, cilengitide (1–100 µM) induces detachment in some, albeit
not all glioma cell lines, while the effect on cell viability is modest. Detachment induced by
2
cilengitide could not be predicted by the level of expression of the cilengitide target
molecules,
v
3 and
v
5, at the cell surface. Glioma cell death induced by cilengitide was
associated with the generation of caspase activity, but caspase activity was dispensable for
cell death since ectopic expression of cytokine response modifier (crm)-A or coexposure to
the broad spectrum caspase inhibitor, zVAD-fmk, were not protective. Moreover, forced
expression of Bcl-XL or altering the p53 status did not modulate cilengitide-induced cell
death. No consistent effects of cilengitide on glioma cell migration or invasiveness were
observed in vitro. Preliminary clinical results indicate a preferential benefit from cilengitide
added to temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy in patients with O6–
methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation. Accordingly, we also examined
whether the MGMT status determines glioma cell responses to cilengitide alone or in
combination with temozolomide. Neither ectopic expression of MGMT in MGMT-negative
cells nor silencing the MGMT gene in MGMT-positive cells altered their response to
cilengitide alone or cilengitide in combination with temozolomide. These data suggest that
the beneficial clinical effects derived from cilengitide in vivo may arise from altered
perfusion which promotes temozolomide delivery to glioma cells.
Key Words: glioma, integrin, cilengitide, temozolomide, chemotherapy
|
|