Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


First published on September 16, 2008
This version was published on January 1, 2009
Neuro Oncol 2009 11(1):33-40; DOI:10.1215/15228517-2008-079
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/1/33    most recent
15228517-2008-079v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chintagumpala, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gajjar, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Duke University Press

Clinical Investigations

A pilot study of risk-adapted radiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with supratentorial PNET

Murali Chintagumpala, Tim Hassall, Shawna Palmer, David Ashley, Dana Wallace, Kimberly Kasow, Thomas E. Merchant, Matthew J. Krasin, Robert Dauser, Frederick Boop, Robert Krance, Shiao Woo, Robyn Cheuk, Ching Lau, Richard Gilbertson and Amar Gajjar

Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA (M.C.); Royal Children's Hospital, Department of Haematology/Oncology, Herston, Brisbane, Australia (T.H., R.C.); Division of Behavioral Medicine (S.P.) and Division of Radiation Oncology (T.E.M., M.J.K.), Department of Radiological Sciences; Division of Neurosurgery (F.B.), Department of Biostatistics (D.W.); Divisions of Bone Marrow Transplantation (K.K.) and Neuro-Oncology (A.G.), Department of Oncology; and Department of Developmental Neurobiology (R.G.), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA; Royal Children's Hospital, Department of Clinical Haematology and Oncology, Parkville, Australia (D.A.); Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA (R.D.); Texas Children's Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA (R.K., C.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA (S.W.)

Address correspondence to Murali Chintagumpala, Texas Children's Cancer Center, 6621 Fannin St., Houston, TX 77030, USA (mxchinta{at}txccc.org).

We undertook this study to estimate the event-free survival (EFS) of patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor (SPNET) treated with risk-adapted craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with additional radiation to the primary tumor site and subsequent high-dose chemotherapy supported by stem cell rescue. Between 1996 and 2003, 16 patients with SPNET were enrolled. High-risk (HR) disease was differentiated from average-risk (AR) disease by the presence of residual tumor (M0 and tumor size > 1.5 cm2) or disseminated disease in the neuraxis (M1–M3). Patients received risk-adapted CSI: those with AR disease received 23.4 Gy; those with HR disease, 36–39.6 Gy. The tumor bed received a total of 55.8 Gy. Subsequently, all patients received four cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and vincristine with stem cell support. The median age at diagnosis was 7.9 years; eight patients were female. Seven patients had pineal PNET. Twelve patients are alive at a median follow-up of 5.4 years. The 5-year EFS and overall survival (OS) estimates for all patients were 68% ± 14% and 73% ± 13%. The 5-year EFS and OS estimates were 75% ± 17% and 88% ± 13%, respectively, for the eight patients with AR disease and 60% ± 19% and 58% ± 19%, respectively, for the eight with HR disease. No deaths were due to toxicity. High-dose cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy with stem cell support after risk-adapted CSI results in excellent EFS estimates for patients with newly diagnosed AR SPNET. Further, this chemotherapy allows for a reduction in the dose of CSI used to treat AR SPNET without compromising EFS.

Key Words: autologous stem cell rescue • craniospinal radiotherapy • dose-intensive chemotherapy • event-free survival • risk-adapted therapy • supratentorial PNET


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuro-Oncology