Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Neuro Oncol 1999 1(3):221-230; DOI:10.1215/15228517-1-3-221
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Strother, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Symposia Epidemiology of Brain Tumors

CNS tumors and exposure to acrylonitrile: Inconsistency between experimental and epidemiology studies

James J. Collins1 and Dale E. Strother

Solutia, Inc., St. Louis, MO 63166-6760 [J.J.C.]; and BP Chemicals, Inc., Warrensville Heights, OH 44128-2837 [D.E.S.]

1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to James J. Collins, Solutia, Inc., 10300 Olive Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63166-6760.

Abstract

Acrylonitrile is a potent CNS tumorigen in rats leading to concern that it may be a tumorigen in humans. There have been 12 epidemiology studies of 37,352 workers exposed to acrylonitrile which evaluate CNS cancers. We summarize and evaluate these epidemiology studies for CNS cancers using the methods of meta-analysis. Our analyses indicate that workers with acrylonitrile exposure have null findings for CNS cancer (relative risk = 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.8-1.5), which are in stark contrast to the projected risk to humans using the rat findings (relative risk = 3.5, 95% confidence interval 3.0-4.0). We discuss several explanations for the inconsistency between animal and human findings, including the possibility that the acrylonitrile-induced rat CNS tumors may not be relevant to humans. Given the rarity of CNS tumors in humans and a lack of understanding of the causal mechanisms of these tumors in rats, however, a more definitive conclusion will have to await additional experimental and observational data. Nevertheless, the epidemiology evidence indicates that acrylonitrile is not a potent CNS tumorigen.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
S. M. Rappaport, L. L. Kupper, and Y. S. Lin
On the Importance of Exposure Variability to the Doses of Volatile Organic Compounds
Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2005; 83(2): 224 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
L. M. Sweeney, M. L. Gargas, D. E. Strother, and G. L. Kedderis
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model Parameter Estimation and Sensitivity and Variability Analyses for Acrylonitrile Disposition in Humans
Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2003; 71(1): 27 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1999 by Society for Neuro-Oncology